HUBUNGAN KARAKTERISTIK STOMATA DAN PRODUKTIVITAS UMBI PADA AKSESI LOKAL TERPILIH Dioscorea alata L.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Diterbitkan: December 30, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/bkr.2022.792
Download
PDF
Statistic

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.
Vol 25 No 3 (2022): BULETIN KEBUN RAYA 25(3), Desember 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Thania Ayu Pramesty
Jurusan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Malang
Sofia Ery Rahayu
Jurusan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Malang
Fauziah
Pusat Riset Konservasi Tumbuhan, Kebun Raya, dan Kehutanan - BRIN

Abstrak

Stomata diketahui memiliki hubungan dengan aktivitas fisiologis tanaman seperti fotosintesis, respirasi, dan transpirasi yang berpengaruh terhadap produktivitas tanaman. Uwi (Dioscorea alata L.) merupakan salah satu tanaman umbi-umbian kurang termanfaatkan dengan nutrisi penting dan potensi hasil tinggi, namun kurang mendapatkan perhatian dari masyarakat. Minimnya informasi terkait faktor yang berperan dalam mendukung produksi yang melimpah, menjadi salah satu penyebab kurangnya minat budidaya jenis ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi karakteristik stomata, produktivitas umbi, serta hubungan antara karakteristik stomata dan produktivitas umbi. Penelitian dilakukan di Kabupaten Pasuruan, menggunakan aksesi 57 dan 86 yang dipilih berdasarkan keunggulan produktivitas tinggi (bobot umbi). Analisis menggunakan uji T, Mann-Whitney, dan uji korelasi Spearman. Hasil studi menunjukkan aksesi 86 lebih tinggi dibandingkan aksesi 57 dalam hal jumlah stomata, kerapatan stomata, bobot umbi, lebar umbi, dan diameter umbi, meskipun pada ukuran keliling stomata dan panjang umbi aksesi 57 lebih tinggi. Jumlah dan kerapatan stomata memiliki korelasi positif dengan bobot umbi, sedangkan ukuran keliling stomata dengan bobot umbi menunjukkan korelasi negatif. Data bobot umbi aksesi 86 lebih besar nilainya dibandingkan aksesi 57, namun tidak berbeda nyata secara signifikan. Kedua aksesi ini berpotensi untuk dibudidayakan dengan memperhatikan kondisi lingkungan tanam agar produktivitas umbi uwi dapat dihasilkan secara optimal dan mendukung upaya diversifikasi pangan nasional berbasis komoditas lokal.


 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Cara Mengutip
Pramesty TA, Rahayu SE, Fauziah. 2022. HUBUNGAN KARAKTERISTIK STOMATA DAN PRODUKTIVITAS UMBI PADA AKSESI LOKAL TERPILIH Dioscorea alata L. Buletin Kebun Raya 25(3): 110-120. https://doi.org/10.55981/bkr.2022.792

Referensi

  1. A’yuningsih, D. 2017. Pengaruh faktor lingkungan terhadap perubahan struktur anatomi daun. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Biologi. Yogyakarta.
  2. Abdillah R. 2015. Perbaikan ruang tumbuhan umbi uwi (Dioscorea alata L.) dan pengaruhnya terhadap pertumbuhan dan produktivitas umbi. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
  3. Abdulrahaman AA, Egbedo FO, Oladele FA. 2009. Stomatal complex types, stomatal density, and the stomatal index in some species of Dioscorea. Archives of Biological Sciences 61(4): 847–851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS0904847A.
  4. Agre P, Asibe F, Darkwa K, Edemodu A, Bauchet G, Asiedu R, Adebola P, Asfaw A. 2019. Phenotypic and molecular assessment of genetic structure and diversity in a panel of winged yam (Dioscorea alata) clones and cultivars. Scientific Reports 9(1): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54761-3.
  5. Andika ED, Kartijono NE, Rahayu ES. 2017. Struktur dan komposisi tumbuhan pada lantai hutan jati di kawasan RPH Bogorejo BKPH Tanggel Blora. Life Science 6(1): 1–39.
  6. Ariska FM, Qurniawan B. 2021. Perkembangan impor beras di Indonesia. Journal of Agriculture and Animal Science 1(1): 27–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47637/agrimals.v1i1.342.
  7. Assmann SM, Jegla T. 2016. Guard cell sensory systems: recent insights on stomatal responses to light, abscisic acid, and CO2. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 33: 157–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.07.003.
  8. Beerling DJ, Woodward FI. 1997. Changes in land plant function over the Phanerozoic: reconstructions based on the fossil record. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 124: 137–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1997.tb01787.x.
  9. Bertolino LT, Caine RS, Gray JE. 2019. Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world. Frontiers in Plant Science 10(225): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpls.2019.00225.
  10. Chandrasekara A, Kumar TJ. 2016. Roots and tuber crops as functional foods: A review on phytochemical constituents and their potential health benefits. International Journal of Food Science 2016: 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3631647.
  11. Chaves MM, Costa JM, Zarrouk O, Pinheiro C, Lopes CM, Pereira JS. 2016. Controlling stomatal aperture in semi-arid regions. The dilemma of saving water or being cool? Plant Science 251: 54–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.06.015.
  12. Chen ZH, Chen G, Dai F, Wang Y, Hills A, Ruan YL, Blatt MR. 2017. Molecular evolution of grass stomata. Trends in Plant Science 22(2): 124–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.09.005.
  13. Drake PL, Froend RH, Franks PJ. 2013. Smaller, faster stomata: Scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany 64(2): 495–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers347.
  14. Dufie WMF, Oduro I, Ellis WO, Asiedu R, Maziya-Dixon B. 2013. Potential health benefits of water yam (Dioscorea alata). Food and Function 4(10): 1496–1501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fo60064e.
  15. Egbucha KC, Akpanudo SI, Andrew OV. 2021. Effect of chromosome number variations on stomata size and tuber yield in some accessions of white yam (Dioscorea Rotundata Poir). African Scholar Journal of Agriculture and Agricultural Tech 21(1): 1–16.
  16. Farquhar GD, Buckley TN, Miller JM. 2002. Optimal stomatal control in relation to leaf area and nitrogen content. Silvia Fennica 36(3): 625–637.
  17. Fauziah, Mas’udah, S. 2015. Explorations diversity of Dioscorea spp. varieties from Pasuruan, East Java: inventory and characterization. Agrivita 37(3): 193–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17503/Agrivita-2015-37-3-p193-203.
  18. Fauziah, Mas’udah S, Hapsari L, Nurfadilah S. 2020. Biochemical composition and nutritional value of fresh tuber of water yam (Dioscorea alata L.) local accessions from East Java, Indonesia. Agrivita 42(2): 255–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v0i0.2552.
  19. Ferraro V, Piccirillo C, Tomlins K, Pintado ME. 2015. Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and Yam (Dioscorea spp.) crops and their derived foodstuffs: Safety, security and nutritional value. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 56(16): 2714–2727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.922045.
  20. Fiqa AP, Nursafitri TH, Fauziah, Masudah S. 2021. Pengaruh faktor lingkungan terhadap pertumbuhan beberapa aksesi Dioscorea alata L. terpilih koleksi Kebun Raya Purwodadi. Jurnal Agro 8(1): 25–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/10594.
  21. Franks PJ. 2006. Higher rates of leaf gas exchange are associated with higher leaf hydrodynamic pressure gradients. Plant, Cell and Environment 29(4): 584–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01434.x.
  22. Franks PJ, Farquhar GD. 2007. The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance in gas-exchange control. Plant Physiology 143(1): 78–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.089367.
  23. Franks PJ, Beerling DJ. 2009. Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geological time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(25): 10343–10347. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904209106.
  24. Franks J, Leitch IJ, Ruszala EM, Hetherington AM, Beerling DJ. 2012. Physiological framework for adaptation of stomata to CO2 from glacial to future concentrations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367(1588): 537–546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0270.
  25. Grant BW, Vatnick I. 2004. Environmental correlates of leaf stomata density. Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology 1: 1–24.
  26. Gratani L. 2014. Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Advances in Botany 2014(208747). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/ 208747.
  27. Hafiz P, Dorly, Rahayu S. 2013. The anatomical characteristics of ten succulent Hoya leaves. Buletin Kebun Raya 16(1): 58–73.
  28. Hanafie R. 2010. Peran pangan pokok lokal tradisional dalam diversifikasi konsumsi pangan. JSEP (Journal of Social and Agricultural Economics) 4(2): 1–7.
  29. Hapsari RT. 2014. Prospek uwi sebagai pangan fungsional dan bahan diversifikasi pangan. Buletin Palawija 27: 26–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21082/bulpalawija.v0n27.2014.p26-38.
  30. Harrison EL, Arce Cubas L, Gray JE, Hepworth C. 2020. The influence of stomatal morphology and distribution on photosynthetic gas exchange. Plant Journal 101(4): 768–779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14560.
  31. Haryanti S. 2010. Pengaruh naungan yang berbeda terhadap jumlah stomata dan ukuran porus stomata daun Zephyranthes Rosea Lindl. Buletin Anatomi dan Fisiologi 18(1): 41–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/baf.v18i1.2617.
  32. Hong T, Lin H, He D. 2018. Characteristics and correlations of leaf stomata in different Aleurites montana provenances. PLoS ONE 13(12): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208899.
  33. Huber H. 1998. Dioscoreaceae. In Kubitzki K (ed.) The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, III Lilianae (except Orchidaceae). Springer, Germany.
  34. Khoiroh Y, Harijati N, Mastuti R. 2014. Pertumbuhan serta hubungan kerapatan stomata dan berat umbi pada Amorphophallus muelleri Blume dan Amorphophallus variabilis Blume. Jurnal Biotropika 2(5): 249–253.
  35. Kinasih NA, Saptadi D, Soetopo L. 2017. Variasi karakter morfologi tanaman uwi (Dioscorea alata L.) di Kabupaten Turen dan Malang. Jurnal Produksi Tanaman 5(6): 971–980.
  36. Lestari T, Apriyadi R. 2017. Genetic potential of cassava biodiversity in Bangka Island, Indonesia. Cell Biology and Development 1(2): 41–45. DOI: 10.13057/cellbioldev/v010202.
  37. Lynch J, Marschner P, Rengel Z. 2012. Effect of internal and external factors on root growth and development. The University of Western Australia, Australia.
  38. Maghsoudi K, Moud AM. 2008. Analysis of the effects of stomatal frequency and size on transpiration and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 3(6): 865–872.
  39. Mahanani AU, Tuhuteru S, Haryanto TAD, Rif’an M. 2020. Karakteristik stomata daun tanaman padi gogo (Oryza sativa L.) berdasarkan ketinggian tempat tumbuh di Kabupaten Jayawijaya. Gontor AGROTECH Science Journal 6(3): 251–281. DOI: 10.21111/agrotech.v6i3.4940.
  40. Martins S, Pompelli M, Ventrella M, DaMatta F, Celin E. 2010. What is the influence of ordinary epidermal cells and stomata on the leaf plasticity of coffee plants grown under full-sun and shady conditions? Brazilian Journal of Biology 70(4): 1083–1088.
  41. Mas’udah S, Fauziah, Hapsari L. 2019. Cluster analysis of Dioscorea alata accessions of Purwodadi Botanic Gardens (Indonesia) collection based on morphological characteristic and SSR markers. Cell Biology and Development 3(1): 6–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/cellbioldev/t030102.
  42. Matthaeus WJ, Schmidt J, White JD, Zechmann B. 2020. Novel perspectives on stomatal impressions: Rapid and non-invasive surface characterization of plant leaves by scanning electron microscopy. PLoS ONE 15(9): e0238589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238589
  43. McAusland L, Vialet-Chabrand S, Davey P, Baker NR, Brendel O, Lawson T. 2016. Effects of kinetics of light-induced stomatal responses on photosynthesis and water-use efficiency. The New Phytologist 211(4): 1209–1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14000.
  44. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1957. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons Leaves, Stem, and Wood in Relation to Taxonomy with Notes on Economic Uses. Oxford University Press, London.
  45. Metcalfe CR, Chalk L. 1988. Anatomy of Dicotyledons. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, London.
  46. Mustika, Daningsih E, Marlina R. 2018. Analisis ukuran dan tipe stomata tanaman di kota Pontianak. Artikel Penelitian 11(1): 1–4.
  47. Nugroho LH, Purnomo, Sumardi, I. 2006. Struktur dan Perkembangan Tumbuhan. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
  48. Ogidi IA, Wariboko C, Alamene A. 2017. Evaluation of some nutritional properties of water -yam (Dioscorea alata) cultivars in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. European Journal of Food Science and Technology 5(3): 1–14.
  49. Padhan B, Panda D. 2020. Potential of neglected and underutilized yams (Dioscorea spp.) for improving nutritional security and health benefits. Frontiers in Pharmacology 11(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00496.
  50. Purnomo P, Daryono BS, Rugayah R, Sumardi I. 2012. Studi etnobotani Dioscorea spp. (Dioscoreaceae) dan kearifan budaya lokal masyarakat di sekitar Hutan Wonosadi Gunung Kidul Yogyakarta. Jurnal Natur Indonesia 14(3): 191–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/jnat.14.3.191-198.
  51. Purnomo, Daryono BS, Rugayah, Sumardi I, Shiwachi H. 2016. Genetic variability and classification of Indonesian yams (Dioscorea spp.) based on RAPD analysis. Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Genetics 48(4): 377–390.
  52. Purnomo, Sumardi I, Rugayah, Daryono BS. 2020. Identification and phenetic analysis of Dioscorea spp. and Dioscorea alata L. cultivars based on anatomical caharacters. AIP Conference Proceedings. Yogyakarta.
  53. Quraisy A, Madya S. 2021. Analisis nonparametrik Mann Whitney terhadap perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah menggunakan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. VARIANSI: Journal of Statistics and Its Application on Teaching and Research 23(1): 51-57. DOI: 10.35580/variansiunm23810.
  54. Rahayu A, Susanto S, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS. 2017. Karakterisasi morfologi dan isoenzim aksesi pamelo [Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr.] berbiji dan tidak berbiji. Jurnal Hortikultura 27(1): 11–12. DOI: 10.21082/jhort.v27n1.2017.p11-22.
  55. Raissig MT, Matos JL, Gil MXA, Kornfeld A, Bettadapur A, Abrash E, Bergmann DC. 2017. Mobile MUTE specifies subsidiary cells to build physiologically improved grass stomata. Science 355(6330): 1215–1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3254.
  56. Rindyastuti R, Hapsari L. 2017. Adaptasi ekofisiologi terhadap iklim tropis kering: Studi anatomi daun sepuluh jenis tumbuhan berkayu. Jurnal Biologi Indonesia 13(1): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47349/jbi/13012017/1.
  57. Rudall PJ, Chen ED, Cullen E. 2017. Evolution and development of monocot stomata. American Journal of Botany 104(8): 1122–1141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1700086.
  58. Sarmigi E, Angela L, Tiara. 2022. Pengaruh pelatihan dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pada pegadaian Kota Sungai Penuh. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis 25(1): 43-52.
  59. Sass JE. 1951. Botanical Microtechnique Ed. 2. The Iowa State Collage Press, Iowa.
  60. Shan N, Wang PT, Zhu QL, Sun JY, Zhang HY, Liu XY, Cao TX, Chen X, Huang YJ, Zhou QH. 2020. Comprehensive characterization of yam tuber nutrition and medicinal quality of Dioscorea opposita and D. alata from different geographic groups in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 19(11): 2839–2848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63270-1.
  61. Suranto. 2002. Pengaruh Lingkungan terhadap bentuk morfologi tumbuhan. ENVIRO 1(2): 37–40.
  62. Takada K, Kikuno H, Babil P, Irie K, Shiwaci H. 2017. Water yam (Dioscorea alata L.) is able to grow in low fertile soil conditions. Tropical Agricultural and Development 61(1): 8–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.61.8.
  63. Trimanto. 2012. Karakterisasi dan jarak kemiripan uwi (Dioscorea alata L.) berdasarkan penanda morfologi ubi. Buletin Kebun Raya 15(1): 47–57.
  64. Trimanto, Hapsari L. 2015. Diversity and utilization of Dioscorea spp. tuber as alternative food source in Nganjuk Regency, East Java. Agrivita 37(2): 97–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17503/Agrivita-2015-37-2-p097-107.
  65. Verma KK, Song XP, Zeng Y, Li DM, Guo DJ, Rajput VD, Chen GL, Barakhov A, Minkina TM, Li YR. 2020. Characteristics of leaf stomata and their relationship with photosynthesis in Saccharum officinarum under drought and silicon application. ACS Omega 5(37): 24145–24153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03820.
  66. Woolfenden HC, Baillie AL, Gray JE, Hobbs JK, Morris RJ, Fleming AJ. 2018. Models and mechanisms of stomatal mechanics. Trends in Plant Science 23(9): 822–832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.06.003.
  67. Wuryantoro, Arifin M. 2017. Explorasi dan identifikasi tanaman umbi-umbian (ganyong, garut, ubi kayu, ubi jalar, talas dan suweg) di wilayah lahan kering Kabupaten Madiun. AGRI-TEK: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian, Kehutanan dan Agroteknologi 18(2), 72–79.
  68. Yunilasari M. 2018. Karakteristik Stomata pada Daun Suku Myrtaceae di UIN Raden Intan Lampung. Skripsi, Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.