PERBANDINGAN KARAKTER ANATOMI DAUN PADA EMPAT KULTIVAR NANGKA (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) KOLEKSI TAMAN BUAH MEKARSARI, BOGOR

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Diterbitkan: August 30, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/bkr.2022.753
Download
PDF
Statistic

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.
Vol 25 No 2 (2022): BULETIN KEBUN RAYA 25(2), Agustus 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Raudya Tuzzahra Ramadhani
Departemen Biologi, FMIPA, IPB University
Nina Ratna Djuita
Departemen Biologi, FMIPA, IPB University
Dorly
Departemen Biologi, FMIPA, IPB University

Abstrak

Taman Buah Mekarsari mengembangkan beberapa kultivar nangka, antara lain kultivar Telanjang, Mini, Bubur, dan Dulang. Keempat kultivar tersebut dibedakan berdasarkan keunikan buahnya. Keragaman kultivar nangka sangat banyak, namun studi mengenai anatomi daun kultivar nangka yang berbeda belum pernah dilakukan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mempelajari karakter anatomi daun beberapa kultivar nangka koleksi Taman Buah Mekarsari, Bogor. Sampel diambil dari tiga pohon untuk tiap kultivar dengan tiga ulangan cabang untuk tiap pohon. Sediaan sayatan paradermal dan transversal dibuat dari daun keempat dari ujung cabang. Hasil pengamatan sayatan paradermal daun menunjukkan sel epidermis berbentuk tidak beraturan dengan dinding sel antiklinal rata hingga berlekuk. Stomata hanya terdapat pada sisi abaksial daun dengan tipe anomositik. Pada kultivar nangka dijumpai dua jenis trikoma, yaitu trikoma kelenjar dan trikoma non kelenjar. Tidak terdapat perbedaan karakter anatomi daun pada semua daun kultivar nangka yang diamati. Hal ini dikarenakan rentang nilai karakter anatomi yang diamati saling tumpang tindih pada keempat kultivar tersebut. Namun demikian, karakter anatomi daun dapat digunakan untuk membedakan kultivar nangka dengan hibrida nangkadak cv. Bola.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Cara Mengutip
Ramadhani RT, Djuita NR, Dorly. 2022. PERBANDINGAN KARAKTER ANATOMI DAUN PADA EMPAT KULTIVAR NANGKA (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) KOLEKSI TAMAN BUAH MEKARSARI, BOGOR. Buletin Kebun Raya 25(2): 84-95. https://doi.org/10.55981/bkr.2022.753

Referensi

  1. Abdel-Raouf HS. 2012. Anatomical traits of some species of Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae) and their taxonomic value. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 57(1): 73–79.
  2. Adedeji O, Ajuwon OY, Babawale OO. 2007. Foliar epidermal studies, organographic distribution and taxonomic importance of trichomes in the family Solanaceae. International Journal of Botany 3(3): 276–282.
  3. Akinloye AJ, Barokini TI, Adeniji KA, Akinnubi FM. 2015. Comparative anatomical studies of Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg and Artocarpus communis (J.R. and G. Forster) in Nigeria. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions 7(6): 709–721.
  4. Al-Edany TY, Al-Saadi SAA. 2012. Taxonomic significance of anatomical characters in some species of the family Myrtaceae. American Journal of Plant Sciences 3: 572–581.
  5. Araújo ND, Coelho VPM, Ventrella MC, Agra MF. 2014. Leaf anatomy and histochemistry of three species of Ficus sect. Americanae supported by light and electron microscopy. Microscopy and Microanalysis 20: 296–304.
  6. Azizian D. 2002. Morphology and distribution of trichomes in some genera (Morus, Ficus, Broussonetia and Maclura) of Moraceae in Iran. The Iranian Journal of Botany 9(2): 195–202.
  7. Chattopadhyay S, Ali KA, Doss SG, Das NK, Aggarwal RK, Bandopadhyay TK, Sarkar A, Bajpai AK. 2011. Association of leaf micro-morphological characters with powdery mildew resistance in field-grown mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm. AoB Plants 2011: 1–11. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plr002.
  8. Fahn A. 1991. Anatomi Tumbuhan (terjemahan). Edisi ke-3. Soediarto A, Koesoemaningrat RMT, Natasaputra M, Akmal H (penerjemah) Universitas Gadjah Mada Press, Yogyakarta.
  9. Gay AP, Hurd RG. 1975. The influence of light on stomatal density in the tomato. New Phytologist 75: 37–46.
  10. Gotoh E, Suetsugu N, Higa T, Matsushita T, Tsukaya H, Wada M. 2017. Palisade cell shape affects the light induced chloroplast movements and leaf. Scientific Report 8: 1–9.
  11. Gratani L, Covone F, Larcher W. 2006. Leaf plasticity in response to light of three evergreen species of the Mediterranean maquis. Trees 20(5): 549–558.
  12. Hakim AR, Dorly, Rahayu S. 2013. Keragaman dan analisis kekerabatan Hoya spp. bertipe daun non sukulen berdasarkan karakter anatomi daun. Buletin Kebun Raya 16(1): 1-17.
  13. Ichie T, Inoue Y, Takahashi N, Kamiya K, Kenzo T. 2016. Ecological distribution of leaf stomata and trichomes among tree species in Malaysian lowland tropical rain forest. Journal of Plant Research 129(4): 625–635.
  14. Johansen DA. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  15. Kardiman R, Ræbild A. 2017. Relationship between stomatal density, size, and speed of opening in Sumatran rainforest species. Tree Physiology 38(5): 696–705.
  16. Kenzo T, Ichie T, Watanabe Y, Hiromi T. 2007. Ecological distribution ofhomobaric and heterobaric leaves in tree species of Malaysian lowland tropical rainforest. American Journal of Botany 94(5): 764–775.
  17. Khan R. 1987. Pharmaco-anatomical evaluation of bark and leaf of some arborescent Moraceae. PhD Disertation, Aligarh Muslim University, Uttar Pradesh.
  18. Khan R, Zerega N, Hossain S, Zuberi MI. 2010. Jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) diversity in Bangladesh: Land use and artificial selection. Economic Botany 64(2): 124–136.
  19. Kumar V, Kodandaramaiah J, Rajan MV. 2012. Leaf and anatomical traits in relation physiological characteristic in mulberry (Morus sp.) cultivars. Turkish Journal of Botany 36(6): 683–689.
  20. Lailati M. 2017. Karakteristik morfologi dan anatomi daun genus Garcinia dataran tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Masyarakat Biodiversitas Indonesia 3(3): 407–411.
  21. Martin C, Glover BJ. 2007. Functional aspects of cell patterning in aerial epidermis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10(1): 70–82.
  22. Molina-Montenegro MA, Ávila P, Hurtado R, Valdivia AI, Gianoli E. 2006. Leaf trichome density may explain herbivory patterns of Actinote sp. (Lepidoptera: Acraeidae) on Liabum mandonii (Asteraceae) in a montane humid forest (Nor Yungas, Bolivia). Acta Oecologica 30(2): 147–150.
  23. Nayak M, Nagarajan A, Majeed M. 2017. Pharmacognostic evaluation of leaf and stem wood extracts of Artocarpus hirsutus Lam. Pharmacognosy Journal 9(6): 887–894.
  24. Nikolopoulos D, Liakopoulos G, Drossopoulos I, Karabourniotis G. 2002. The relationship between anatomy and photosynthetic performance of heterobaric leaves. Plant Physiology 129(1): 235–243.
  25. Palupi D, Aryani RD, Lestari S. 2021. Comparative anatomical studies on some species of the genus Artocarpus. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya 19(1): 30–36.
  26. Reddy TJK, Srikanth K, Padmaja S, Babu PS, Karthikeyan R. 2015. Morpho-anatomical, physicochemical evaluation of leaves Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. Inventi Rapid: Planta Activa 2015(2): 1–5.
  27. Ristic Z, Jenks MA. 2002. Leaf cuticle and water loss in maize lines differing in dehydration avoidance. Journal of Plant Physiology 159(6): 645–651.
  28. Sarjani TM, Mawardi, Pandia ES, Wulandari D. 2017. Identifikasi morfologi dan anatomi tipe stomata famili Piperaceae di kota Langsa. Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA 1(2): 182–191.
  29. Sass JE. 1951. Botanical Microtechnique. Iowa State College Press, Iowa.
  30. Setoguchi H, Okazaki M, Suga S. 1989. Calcification in higher plants with special reference to cystoliths. In: Crick RE (ed). The Fifth International Biomineralization Symposium; 1986 Mei 18-23. Plenum Press, New York.
  31. Sikarwar MS, Hui B, Subramaniam K, Valeisamy BD, Karyean L, Balaji K. 2015. Pharmacognostical, phytochemical and total phenolic content of Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg leaves. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 5(5): 94–100.
  32. Soepadmo. 1991. Artocarpus heterophyllus. In: Verheij EWM, Coronel RE (Eds). Plant Resources of South East Asia Vol 2, Edible Fruits and Nuts. Prosea Foundation, Bogor.
  33. Sosnovsky Y. 2014. Microscopical investigation of the leaf architecture in greenhouse cultivated Ficus (Moraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 301(6): 1669–1692.
  34. Sulassih, Sobir, Santosa E, Tirtawinata MR. 2015. Studi keragaman genetik nangka (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) berdasarkan marka morfologi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Buah Tropika Nusantara II. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hortikultura, Balai Penelitian Tanaman Buah Tropika, Bukittinggi.
  35. Sumardi I, Wulandari M. 2010. Anatomy and morphology character of five Indonesian banana cultivars (Musa spp.) of different ploidy level. Biodiversitas 11(4): 167–175.
  36. Sunarti S. 2007. Anatomi daun dan taksonomi Syzygium zippelianum Miq., S. javanicum Mic. dan S. racemosum (Bl.) DC. Floribunda 3(4): 104–108.
  37. Terashima I. 1992. Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research 31(3): 195–212.
  38. Terashima I, Hanba YT, Tazoe Y, Vyas P, Yano S. 2005. Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. Journal of Experimental Botany 57(2): 343–354.
  39. The Plant List. 2013. Moraceae http://www. theplantlist.org/1.1/browse/A/Moraceae/ (diakses 7 Agustus 2018).
  40. Willmer CM. 1983. Stomata. Longman Group Limited, New York.
  41. Woodward FI. 1987. Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increases in CO2 from pre industrial levels. Nature 327: 617–618.